Library naming change

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   I'm just curious about the naming of the library files. In v9.8, you
guys named them: Codejock.ToolkitPro.Mfc80.v9.80U.dll, but in v9.81,
you went back to: ToolkitPro981vc80U.dll. Is there a design reason for
this? I figured you were following the .NET conventions for MFC as well.

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
eddiepaz Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Groupie Joined: 28 October 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 12	Post Options Post Reply Quote eddiepaz Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: Library naming change Posted: 30 December 2005 at 3:42pm
	I'm just curious about the naming of the library files. In v9.8, you guys named them: Codejock.ToolkitPro.Mfc80.v9.80U.dll, but in v9.81, you went back to: ToolkitPro981vc80U.dll. Is there a design reason for this? I figured you were following the .NET conventions for MFC as well.

Oleg Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Senior Member Joined: 21 May 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11234	Post Options Post Reply Quote Oleg Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 31 December 2005 at 10:05am
	Yes, we wanted to follow .NET but after release 9.80 we discovered that linker of all versions have bug and relink each time if name of lib file has dot :( So we back to old names.
	Oleg, Support Team CODEJOCK SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS