Codejock Developer Community : Library naming change

Codejock Developer Community : Library naming change http://forum.codejock.com/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Mon, 06 Apr 2026 21:39:11 +0000 Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:05:14 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 forum.codejock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=3456 <![CDATA[Codejock Developer Community]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_images/codejock-logo.gif http://forum.codejock.com/ <![CDATA[Library naming change : Yes, we wanted to follow .NET...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3456&PID=10377&title=library-naming-change#10377 Author: Oleg
Subject: 3456
Posted: 31 December 2005 at 10:05am

Yes, we wanted to follow .NET but after release 9.80 we discovered that linker of all versions have bug and relink each time if name of lib file has dot :(

So we back to old names.

]]> Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:05:14 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3456&PID=10377&title=library-naming-change#10377 <![CDATA[Library naming change : I'm just curious about the...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3456&PID=10374&title=library-naming-change#10374 Author: eddiepaz
Subject: 3456
Posted: 30 December 2005 at 3:42pm

I'm just curious about the naming of the library files. In v9.8, youguys named them: Codejock.ToolkitPro.Mfc80.v9.80U.dll, but in v9.81,you went back to: ToolkitPro981vc80U.dll. Is there a design reason forthis? I figured you were following the .NET conventions for MFC as well.

]]> Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:42:57 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=3456&PID=10374&title=library-naming-change#10374