Codejock Forums Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Codejock Products > ActiveX COM > Suite Pro
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Which version of VS .NET do you use for C
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhich version of VS .NET do you use for C

 Post Reply Post Reply
Poll Question: Which version of VS .NET do you use for C#/VB.NET?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
2 [2.38%]
8 [9.52%]
71 [84.52%]
3 [3.57%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message
SuperMario View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 14 February 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 18057
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Which version of VS .NET do you use for C
    Posted: 02 November 2006 at 9:57am
Hello all, we are trying to get an idea of witch version of Visual Studio .NET C# and VB.NET developers are currently using.  Does anyone still use Visual Studio 2002?

What features do you expect from a .NET component?

Thank you for your participation
Back to Top
fantama View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 12 October 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 15
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 November 2006 at 3:08pm
VS 2005
Back to Top
ABuenger View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 02 February 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1075
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 November 2006 at 5:17pm
Definitely VS2005 and .NET 2.0

I'm also not sure if I'm interested in a WinForms toolkit, I would only switch from MFC to WPF, from MFC to WinForms is pointless in my eyes.

Also what is with C++/CLI?

Codejock support
Back to Top
Shragel View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 15 May 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 48
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 November 2006 at 6:48pm
Only using VB6
Back to Top
JamesH View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 December 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 November 2006 at 12:20pm
Using VC 6!  We switched over to CodeJock from Infragistics specifically because they stopped supporting their ocx controls...
Back to Top
Shragel View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 15 May 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 48
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 November 2006 at 2:15pm
Hopefully its not going to happen here.
Back to Top
SuperMario View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 14 February 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 18057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 November 2006 at 4:34pm
No, it won't happen here
Back to Top
Shragel View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 15 May 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 48
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 November 2006 at 6:58pm
Thats good. We invested alot of time in this because its still in com.
Back to Top
tobi View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 September 2004
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 451
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 November 2006 at 5:15am
I would expect a control suite with same functionality of XtremeToolkit to ease porting ! Design time designers would be great !!!
Back to Top
fwhite View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 13 April 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 5
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 November 2006 at 3:55pm
VC 6, and hope to continue to do so.
Back to Top
EdwinSchild View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 03 December 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 November 2006 at 5:30am
Docking is the most important feature since that is missing in WinForms
Back to Top
MNovaro View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 20 June 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 71
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 November 2006 at 5:40am
Right now, VB6 only 
Back to Top
hipopotamo View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 01 June 2006
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 34
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 December 2006 at 2:00pm

Hi,

We still use Visual Studio 6.0.
 
My answer is 2002.
 
But I pool the wrong one.  2005 :-(
 
Back to Top
hipopotamo View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 01 June 2006
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 34
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 December 2006 at 2:11pm
Hi again,
 
  The main reason we choose CodeJock its because VC 6.0 support
 
  So it would be very, very sad news if Codejock stop supporting this platform
 
 
 
 Regards
 
 

 

Back to Top
Philip View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 25 November 2006
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
Points: 28
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 December 2006 at 8:12pm
Visual Studio 6.0
The costs in higher versions are grater than the benefits (high resources needed, slow running).
 
Our clients don't pay us for .Net, they pay us for fast solutions to their needs, and vb6 can do it for the next 10 years.
BORG Design - Sultanescu Philip
Back to Top
flauzer View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 December 2003
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 108
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 December 2006 at 12:08pm
Visual Studio 6.0 (only) for Windows programs
 
VS2005 and .NET 2.0 for WEB
Back to Top
tommylov View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 09 January 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 20
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 January 2007 at 2:53pm
Yes, I'm still using VS2002.
Back to Top
asifimam View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 20 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 January 2007 at 3:15am

VS-2005 for both 32 and 64 bit platforms.
We are just waiting to buy 64-bit compliant ActiveX controls.

 

Debug till Nobug
Back to Top
EdwinSchild View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 03 December 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 January 2007 at 5:19am

We didn't renew our maintenance because Codejock couldn't make any statement about 64-bits and we desperately need it.

Back to Top
Simon HB9DRV View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 July 2005
Location: Switzerland
Status: Offline
Points: 458
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31 January 2007 at 6:16am
FWIW I use Visual Studio 6.0 with C++, I hope this will be supported for a long time to come (please).
Simon HB9DRV
Back to Top
SuperMario View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 14 February 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 18057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 February 2007 at 12:20pm
Originally posted by EdwinSchild EdwinSchild wrote:

We didn't renew our maintenance because Codejock couldn't make any statement about 64-bits and we desperately need it.



Use VS 2005 to compile in 64 bit.  It will work.
Back to Top
EdwinSchild View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 03 December 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 February 2007 at 1:12pm
Very good idea.
 
 
Back to Top
Shragel View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 15 May 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 48
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 February 2007 at 3:13pm
:)
Back to Top
fabioraciti View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 07 March 2007
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 April 2007 at 12:54pm
vc2005
Back to Top
daveED View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 16 August 2006
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 37
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 April 2007 at 6:52am
VB 2003 & now using VB 2005
Back to Top
joeliner View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 June 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 273
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 April 2007 at 8:24am
Visual Basic 6.0(since we have to support our existing systems)

rolling over to VS 2005 for all our new products.
Product: Xtreme SuitePro (ActiveX) version 13.1
Platform: Windows XP SP 3
Language: Visual Basic 6 SP6
Back to Top
JohnCrenshaw View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 08 September 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 65
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 April 2007 at 3:06pm
I'm using VS 2005 but I have some strong feelings on this issue. Companies that don't HAVE to use 2005 (for Unicode debugging or something) are wise to stick with 6.0. 2005 was a HUGE step backwards, and ultimately decreases efficiency. Many key features that worked great in 6.0 vanished sometime before 2005 made it out the door and made things much worse.
 
Back to Top
gshawn View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 04 October 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 227
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 April 2007 at 9:21pm
VB 6.0 for all existing products, VS 2005 for one or two new ones
Back to Top
yair-edsoft View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 14 April 2007
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 14
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 April 2007 at 11:43am
We are using VB6.0
New Product VS2005
yair
Back to Top
yair-edsoft View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 14 April 2007
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 14
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 April 2007 at 11:43am
We are using VB6.0
New Products VS2005
yair
Back to Top
Raver View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 13 June 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 7
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 June 2007 at 1:32pm
VC 6
Back to Top
Metodo_Sviluppo View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 02 September 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 43
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 June 2007 at 4:04am
VB6
Back to Top
Rhogan View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 16 March 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 June 2007 at 9:32pm
Pure C++ using VS2005
Back to Top
faizullah View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 31 July 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 August 2007 at 10:27am
We are using visual studio 2003 and using vb.net. But I couldn't make the skinframe working in vb.net form. Do you have any sample code to do that?
Back to Top
SuperMario View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 14 February 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 18057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 August 2007 at 12:00pm
Originally posted by faizullah faizullah wrote:

We are using visual studio 2003 and using vb.net. But I couldn't make the skinframe working in vb.net form. Do you have any sample code to do that?


You can do something like this, just make sure the styles folder path is correct:

  Private Sub frmMain_Load(ByVal eventSender As System.Object, ByVal eventArgs As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load

    Dim skinFolder As String
    skinFolder = System.IO.Path.GetDirectoryName(Application.ExecutablePath) + "\..\..\..\Styles\"

    SkinFramework.LoadSkin(skinFolder + "Office2007.cjstyles", "NormalAqua.ini")

...
...
...

End Sub

  Private Sub frmMain_VisibleChanged(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.VisibleChanged
    If Me.Visible Then
      SkinFramework.ApplyWindow(Me.Handle.ToInt32())
      Me.BackColor = SkinFramework.GetColor(XtremeSkinFramework.XTPColorManagerColor.STDCOLOR_BTNFACE)
    End If
  End Sub
Back to Top
dlt123 View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 20 September 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 3
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 September 2007 at 12:18am
Well I guess I am using Visual Studio 2002 since I am using Visual C++ Studio 6.0 Professional... which brings me to a question I've been pondering. 

I am learning VS C++ and bought VS 6 Pro a couple of years ago.  I never got around to learning C++, but am now.

Should I consider getting Visual Studio 2005 Pro, if so why?  I would rather take the funds and get the CodeJock Xtreme ToolkitPro. 

Is VS 2005 that much better then VS 6.0?  Am I missing something because I am using VS6.0... accept my brain?...

Thanks,
Dennis
Belief has no affect on reality.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.219 seconds.