Row Selection By Check Box
Printed From: Codejock Forums
Category: Codejock Products
Forum Name: Report Control
Forum Description: Topics Related to Codejock Report Control
URL: http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=17207
Printed Date: 15 November 2024 at 1:20pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Row Selection By Check Box
Posted By: SHAN
Subject: Row Selection By Check Box
Date Posted: 06 September 2010 at 5:16am
|
Hi,
I want to select Rows using Selection Box.
Is there any Inbuilt check box for each Rows for Selection or do we need to loop through all rows with adding a check box Column?
------------- Product: Xtreme SuitePro (ActiveX) version 15.0.2 Platform: Windows 7 Professional Language: Visual Basic 6.0 |
Replies:
Posted By: Hemesh
Date Posted: 10 September 2010 at 4:35am
|
I think you'd have to add a checkbox to each record in the first item column. ------------- Product: Xtreme SuitePro (ActiveX) version 18.5.0 Platform: Windows 7 Enterprise (64-bit) Language: Visual Basic 6.0 |
Posted By: SHAN
Date Posted: 12 September 2010 at 5:13am
|
Thanks Hemesh,
In future Release if they have option like this will be easier..!
So that you can loop through Selected Rows.
Reportcontrol1.Rowselectioncheckbox=true
If you add a column you have to loop through All Rows for checked status...
It's time consuming...!
------------- Product: Xtreme SuitePro (ActiveX) version 15.0.2 Platform: Windows 7 Professional Language: Visual Basic 6.0 |
Posted By: Hemesh
Date Posted: 13 September 2010 at 3:26am
|
If more people on the form indicate this, then I'm sure it'll be included :) ------------- Product: Xtreme SuitePro (ActiveX) version 18.5.0 Platform: Windows 7 Enterprise (64-bit) Language: Visual Basic 6.0 |
Posted By: Aaron
Date Posted: 13 September 2010 at 9:03am
|
Hi SHAN,
What is difference between looping rows and selected rows? The only thing that would be different when you would have "Rowselectioncheckbox" you don't have to set .HasCheckbox for a ReportItem. You still have to check 'selected value' and todo this, you have to loop rows. Maybe I don't understand what you are trying to say and I would like to hear what you are trying to accomplish.
------------- Product: Xtreme SuitePro (ActiveX) version 15.0.2 Platform: Windows XP (32bit) - SP 2 Language: Visual Basic 6.0 Zero replies is not an option.... |
Posted By: Hemesh
Date Posted: 13 September 2010 at 9:18am
Having the control already do it makes it less code for the end user, so he's just being lazy 
------------- Product: Xtreme SuitePro (ActiveX) version 18.5.0 Platform: Windows 7 Enterprise (64-bit) Language: Visual Basic 6.0 |
Posted By: SHAN
Date Posted: 14 September 2010 at 8:20am
|
Hi Aaron,
Suppose I have 1000 and above records, I need to select some records ( Ex: 10 to 15 Records) and do some action...
Case 1:
If there is a Row Selection Check box I can simply use this Code
for i=0 to ReportControl1.SelectedRows.count - 1
' Do any Action
' This will loop only 10 to 15 Records....!
next
Case 2:
If i try to add check box for 1000 and above records itself will take some time...
then you have to loop through all rows to check whthere row Selected or Not...?
for i=0 to ReportControl1.Rows.count - 1
if ReportControl1.Rows(i).record.Item(0).Checked=true then
' Do any Action
end if
' This will loop 1000 and above Records....!
next
In my case I have records sometime above 10,000.
So that is the reason i am expecting some option like
ReportControl1.rowselectioncheck=true.
------------- Product: Xtreme SuitePro (ActiveX) version 15.0.2 Platform: Windows 7 Professional Language: Visual Basic 6.0 |
Posted By: Hemesh
Date Posted: 14 September 2010 at 8:42am
|
Could you possibly record the records that the user "ticks" into a collection and they just pull out the records by index to help speed things up (if the feature you want doesn't get implemented)? ------------- Product: Xtreme SuitePro (ActiveX) version 18.5.0 Platform: Windows 7 Enterprise (64-bit) Language: Visual Basic 6.0 |
Posted By: Aaron
Date Posted: 14 September 2010 at 10:35am
Hi,
If you are talking about few thousand records, I wouldn't worry about iterating "those few records". If it would take more than a second to iterate entire collection, I would consider what Hemish proposed. Well, you need some 500.000 records (tested with my own laptop) to get to that second "waiting" and users don't notice that small delay (in your case).
------------- Product: Xtreme SuitePro (ActiveX) version 15.0.2 Platform: Windows XP (32bit) - SP 2 Language: Visual Basic 6.0 Zero replies is not an option.... |
SHAN wrote: