Latest source still buggy
Printed From: Codejock Forums
Category: Codejock Products
Forum Name: Report Control
Forum Description: Topics Related to Codejock Report Control
URL: http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018
Printed Date: 04 November 2025 at 11:12am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Latest source still buggy
Posted By: znakeeye
Subject: Latest source still buggy
Date Posted: 20 August 2009 at 5:43pm
Just downloaded the latest source-rar (1 hour ago). I reported this before, and just like then, it took me 5 seconds to find this issue.
 After records 4..N have been copy-dropped to another report control, I make a new selection (0..N+2). As you can see, N+1 is not selected. ------------- PokerMemento - http://www.pokermemento.com/ |
Replies:
Posted By: mdoubson
Date Posted: 20 August 2009 at 6:50pm
|
Could you reproduce same case in https://forum.codejock.com/uploads/DemoVersion/ReportPaneViewStatic.rar - https://forum.codejock.com/uploads/DemoVersion/ReportPaneViewStatic.rar - use 2 instances or 2 panes? ------------- Mark Doubson, Ph.D. |
Posted By: mdoubson
Date Posted: 20 August 2009 at 10:08pm
|
Take recent updates - it was temporary case - we was moving to 13.2 and now all app show in App About - https://forum.codejock.com/uploads/DemoVersion/ReportControlMFCUpdated.rar - https://forum.codejock.com/uploads/DemoVersion/ReportControlMFCUpdated.rar
https://forum.codejock.com/uploads/DemoVersion/ReportSampleStaticExt.rar - https://forum.codejock.com/uploads/DemoVersion/ReportSampleStaticExt.rar https://forum.codejock.com/uploads/DemoVersion/ReportPaneViewStatic.rar - https://forum.codejock.com/uploads/DemoVersion/ReportPaneViewStatic.rar ------------- Mark Doubson, Ph.D. |
Posted By: znakeeye
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 2:30am
|
Tried your sample. Reproducible, but in your case NO items are selected the second time! ------------- PokerMemento - http://www.pokermemento.com/ |
Posted By: mdoubson
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 2:46am
|
Please check App about - is it 13.2? Timestamp - Aug, 20 - 21:28
Because I can't repoduce it...
Run 2 instances of Pane app - clean second instance - Ctrl+A - Edit - Cut
Drag selection from 1st instance and drop to 2nd instance.
Both instances keep selection - just need to set focus to instance.
Go back to 1st instance - can make any selection now again.
------------- Mark Doubson, Ph.D. |
Posted By: znakeeye
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 4:03am
|
I'll make a sample this weekend!
Please don't release 13.2 before this has been fixed :P ------------- PokerMemento - http://www.pokermemento.com/ |
Posted By: znakeeye
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 7:48am
|
It's so easy to reproduce with your sample. (Just downloaded it - again.)
Select row 2..10, Ctrl+N, Ctrl+tab (back to the first view),
drag the selected rows to the other tab and then drop them,
ctrl+tab again (back to the first view),
now select 0..12 --- NOTHING SELECTED! ------------- PokerMemento - http://www.pokermemento.com/ |
Posted By: mdoubson
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 8:22am
|
Is it happened if you use 2 instances running side by side? No extra switch - TAB - just clean drag'n drop?
This is exactly your steps with 1 instance only witn Ctrl+N, Ctrl+TAB... - 3 screenshots - please look
http://forum.codejock.com/uploads/20090821_083203_Steps.rar - uploads/20090821_083203_Steps.rar
 ------------- Mark Doubson, Ph.D. |
Posted By: znakeeye
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 9:03am
|
No.
Select items in A.
Drag from A to B (active window is now B).
Open up A and make a new selection (like in the screenshot in the first post).
I only did this with ONE exe-instance. ------------- PokerMemento - http://www.pokermemento.com/ |
Posted By: mdoubson
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 9:17am
|
I also use only one instance as you can see on my snapshots. Same actions as you.
BTW - I asked about timestamp and App about version - you did not aswer ------------- Mark Doubson, Ph.D. |
Posted By: znakeeye
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 9:40am
|
Created: 21 august 2009, 13:47:02
No timestamp in About...?? ------------- PokerMemento - http://www.pokermemento.com/ |
Posted By: mdoubson
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 9:45am
|
About show 13.1 OR 13.2
Timestamp - please check exe inside rar - not rar itself which had timestamp of your OS ------------- Mark Doubson, Ph.D. |
Posted By: znakeeye
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 10:03am
|
2009-08-20 21:28 ------------- PokerMemento - http://www.pokermemento.com/ |
Posted By: mdoubson
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 10:11am
|
Thanks - we are running 100% same code (but I am running XP and you - Vista?) I will switch to Vista later and recheck again)
It looks strange - I did all your steps in your order... ------------- Mark Doubson, Ph.D. |
Posted By: mdoubson
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 2:14pm
|
Vista show same proper behaviour - see snapshots
https://forum.codejock.com/uploads/20090821_141456_StepsVista.rar - uploads/20090821_141456_StepsVista.rar ------------- Mark Doubson, Ph.D. |
Posted By: znakeeye
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 3:45pm
|
Lol... header row explains it! :P However, in my project I really have the problem described in the first post. I must create a sample for you to debug! Let me get back to you on this. ------------- PokerMemento - http://www.pokermemento.com/ |
Posted By: mdoubson
Date Posted: 21 August 2009 at 4:20pm
|
OK - I made for you sample where there is no header and footer rows until you turn it with menu - help - header-footer
https://forum.codejock.com/uploads/DemoVersion/ReportPaneViewStaticMod.rar - https://forum.codejock.com/uploads/DemoVersion/ReportPaneViewStaticMod.rar
Please try ------------- Mark Doubson, Ph.D. |
Posted By: znakeeye
Date Posted: 22 August 2009 at 8:57am
|
I think I know what's causing the strange behavior I'm talking about. In my project I must convert dropped records to other types of records (the two report controls are incompatible, so to speak). To accomplish this I handle XTP_NM_REPORT_DROP and inside the handler I re-populate the list of records with the new type of records! Something like this (from memory): // Create a list of new records, compatible with this report control.
...
pItemNotify->pRecords->RemoveAll(); // I believe this call somehow interferes with underlying CJ code. Removing this call yields correct behavior (except that I get too many records)!
for (int i = 0; i < count; ++i)
pItemNotify->pRecords->Add(pNewRecord);
I investigated this yesterday, and soon realized I could not reproduce this problem. I will try the latest source tonight and see if I can find the exact pattern.
Until then, please take a look at your XTP_NM_REPORT_DROP notification message. It could be the culprit! ------------- PokerMemento - http://www.pokermemento.com/ |
Posted By: mdoubson
Date Posted: 22 August 2009 at 10:30am
|
Jason and me made VB case with 2 forms - one 100% based on Core support for DD, 2nd - ignore Core and react itself (in VB code) on notifications:
ReportControl1_DragOverRecords and ReportControl1_RecordsDropped. Both cases give identical positive results.
See the diference - XTP_NM_REPORT_RECORDS_DROPPED - Jason - reaction AFTER Core one (Customization)
and your case - XTP_NM_REPORT_RECORDS_DROP - reaction INSTEAD of Core! .....................................................................................................
if (SendNotifyMessage(XTP_NM_REPORT_DROP, (NMHDR*)&nmData) == -1)
{ CMDTARGET_RELEASE(pDropRecords); return FALSE;} nInsert = pTargetRecord->GetIndex(); if (!bAbove)nInsert++; GetRecords()->Move(nInsert, pDropRecords); Populate(); _SelectRows(pDropRecords); RedrawControl(); SendNotifyMessage(XTP_NM_REPORT_RECORDS_DROPPED, (NMHDR*)&nmData); CMDTARGET_RELEASE(pDropRecords); CMDTARGET_RELEASE(pTargetRecord); return FALSE;------------- Mark Doubson, Ph.D. |
Posted By: znakeeye
Date Posted: 23 August 2009 at 1:35pm
|
Ok, it works now. You can close this until further notice :) ------------- PokerMemento - http://www.pokermemento.com/ |
Posted By: mdoubson
Date Posted: 23 August 2009 at 1:38pm
|
Specially when you use title Topic: Latest source still buggy just because your app has some problem... ------------- Mark Doubson, Ph.D. |
Posted By: znakeeye
Date Posted: 24 August 2009 at 9:03am
|
At the time I created the topic, the latest source had these problems. Please note that without a versioning system (trunk or similar), it's hard to know exactly which version I've got. Etc etc. The original problem had nothing to do with my application.------------- PokerMemento - http://www.pokermemento.com/ |