|
size of this library |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
vjedlicka 
Senior Member 
Joined: 04 September 2007 Status: Offline Points: 122 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: size of this libraryPosted: 04 September 2007 at 9:34am |
|
Hello,
I am considering buying this library. How big is it? I am asking because ToolkitProEval1113vc60D.dll is 16MB, way too big.
Thank you
Vaclav
|
|
 |
|
|
dennisV
Senior Member
Joined: 07 October 2004 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 242 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 September 2007 at 9:48am |
|
The release DLL seems to be around 5.5 megs, but I statically link myself and the executable including CodeJock is under 4 megs.
|
|
|
// W7 64 Ultimate SP1
// VS 2008 // CodeJock 16.2.3 (MFC) |
|
|
|
|
vjedlicka
Senior Member
Joined: 04 September 2007 Status: Offline Points: 122 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 September 2007 at 10:17am |
|
Thanks!
If I link statically, does it matter which features I use in my code?
|
|
|
|
|
mgampi
Senior Member
Joined: 14 July 2003 Status: Offline Points: 1198 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 September 2007 at 1:07pm |
|
Hi;
Statically linking means that only the code used in your app will be inserted into the binaries.
|
|
|
Martin
Product: Xtreme Toolkit v 19.0.0, new Projects v 19.1.0 Platform: Windows 10 v 1909 (64bit) Language: VC++ 2017 |
|
|
|
|
terrym
Senior Member
Joined: 13 April 2007 Status: Offline Points: 836 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 September 2007 at 1:43pm |
|
We also statically link ours and have quite a large project which is only 4.16mb for release build, we are currently using 11.1.3 of XTP
|
|
|
Thank you,
Terry Mancey email terry@tmancey.ltd.uk | linkedin www.tmancey.ltd.uk | twitter @tmancey |
|
|
|
|
vjedlicka
Senior Member
Joined: 04 September 2007 Status: Offline Points: 122 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 September 2007 at 2:49pm |
|
That is a good news
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
dennisV
Senior Member
Joined: 07 October 2004 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 242 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 September 2007 at 7:37pm |
|
I also use BCG (in some projects), and a pretty simple SDI program which doesn't do much is about 2.2 MBs statically linked. I'd say the 2 libraries (BCG and CodeJock) are pretty much similar in size.
|
|
|
// W7 64 Ultimate SP1
// VS 2008 // CodeJock 16.2.3 (MFC) |
|
|
|
|
Rhogan
Newbie 
Joined: 16 March 2007 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 26 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 September 2007 at 10:35pm |
|
You can reduce the size of the Codejock library by adding some defines within the precompiled header to make it some unneeded controls are not included. I know this, because this was once posted here in these forums but off the top of my head I have no idea what the defines were. Stuff like that needs sticked in the message listing, or added to some article. Codejock is awesome but their documentation -- is lousy. Reading their help files have you ever noticed that even their copy of Doxygen has never been registered; probably a bootleg copy.
|
|
|
|
|
dennisV
Senior Member
Joined: 07 October 2004 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 242 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 September 2007 at 4:41am |
|
I have to agree regarding documentation, but it's the same for most libraries. It's the support that counts
 and reading code, for which there's usually no time 
|
|
|
// W7 64 Ultimate SP1
// VS 2008 // CodeJock 16.2.3 (MFC) |
|
|
|
|
vjedlicka
Senior Member
Joined: 04 September 2007 Status: Offline Points: 122 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 September 2007 at 5:09am |
|
Documentation is lousy, but this forums seems to work well :) BTW which one do you like more, BCG or Codejock? |
|
|
|
|
terrym
Senior Member
Joined: 13 April 2007 Status: Offline Points: 836 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 September 2007 at 5:34am |
|
Personally I've never tried BCG, and now we are with CodeJock will stay forever as we believe the support is of a high standard. Agreed the documentation is not the best, but if we have issues we get prompt answers.
|
|
|
Thank you,
Terry Mancey email terry@tmancey.ltd.uk | linkedin www.tmancey.ltd.uk | twitter @tmancey |
|
|
|
|
Simon HB9DRV
Senior Member
Joined: 07 July 2005 Location: Switzerland Status: Offline Points: 458 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 September 2007 at 5:44am |
|
If Codejock were to document everything they would ship many DVD's - it would be way too big to download. There would just be too much and would never be read.
So I'm happy with the samples - if you know enough to use a library like Codejock then you will find what you need in the samples.
Considering what we pay the results are excellent.
|
|
|
Simon HB9DRV
|
|
|
|
|
terrym
Senior Member
Joined: 13 April 2007 Status: Offline Points: 836 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 September 2007 at 5:48am |
|
Totally agreed, as if we cant find in samples Oleg etc. are fast with replies and fixes if necessary.
|
|
|
Thank you,
Terry Mancey email terry@tmancey.ltd.uk | linkedin www.tmancey.ltd.uk | twitter @tmancey |
|
|
|
|
dennisV
Senior Member
Joined: 07 October 2004 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 242 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 September 2007 at 7:19am |
|
I'm more experienced with BCG (3+ years) and I still use it everyday, but I've used CodeJock for the first time about 4 years ago (and stopped) and then started using it again for another project just now and I must say that eventhough I know BCG's shortcomings pretty well (and thus I can get around them better), I like CodeJock better. Support-wise they're about the same, documentation in both... well, doesn't exist
but they get the job done. I would say that CodeJock is a bit more feature-rich.
|
|
|
// W7 64 Ultimate SP1
// VS 2008 // CodeJock 16.2.3 (MFC) |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
vjedlicka wrote: