Skin Framework vs MFC's CMFCVisualManager |
Post Reply |
Author | |
adi.barda
Newbie Joined: 24 August 2011 Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 24 August 2011 at 10:20am |
Hello,
I'm evaluating your Skinning framework for our MFC (vs 2010) MDI application and my question is: in what ways is it better than CMFCVisualManager? Also, I only need the skinning abilities so what is the minimum requirements for using it? (include files, lib files etc) Thank you very much, Adi Barda
|
|
Oleg
Admin Group Joined: 21 May 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11234 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
CMFCVisualManager is not same as SkinFramework.
You call SkinFramework once and it skin all window elements it found. with CMFCVisualManager you must manually subclass each element to corresponding MFC class to see some new look. If you need only Skinfamework, you can purchase Skinframework single package. Try our evaluation version.
|
|
Oleg, Support Team
CODEJOCK SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS |
|
adi.barda
Newbie Joined: 24 August 2011 Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi Oleg,
The skinning framework doesn't work well for us because our main frame inherits from CMDIFrameWndEx and not from CMDIFrameWnd. This is a problem because your skinning framework class "CXTPMDIFrameWnd" inherits from CMDIFrameWnd and not CMDIFrameWndEX. We would like to use/purchase it very much but we have to find a solution for this issue. we must inherit from CMDIFrameWndEX. Thanks, Adi Barda
|
|
ABuenger
Newbie Joined: 02 February 2006 Status: Offline Points: 1075 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Hi,
you only need CXTPMDIFrameWnd if you want to use our CommandBars. If you only want to use the SkinFramework you don't need to derive from CXTPMDIFrameWnd. Andre |
|
Codejock support
|
|
Algae
Senior Member Joined: 08 January 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
What is the recommended process to replace the cmfcvisualmanager with Skin Framework in an existing program?
As was stated before, there can be all sorts of things manually subclassed. It seems like a pretty hefty task to port. Or is it much simpler than I surmise? Perhaps CJ could get some mileage out of this with people who want to improve programs and get away from using the cmfcvisualmanager bag of snakes. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |