Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
SuperMario
Admin Group
Joined: 14 February 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 18057
|
Topic: Which version of VS .NET do you use for C Posted: 02 November 2006 at 9:57am |
Hello all, we are trying to get an idea of witch version of Visual Studio .NET C# and VB.NET developers are currently using. Does anyone still use Visual Studio 2002? What features do you expect from a .NET component? Thank you for your participation
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
fantama
Groupie
Joined: 12 October 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 15
|
Posted: 02 November 2006 at 3:08pm |
VS 2005
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
ABuenger
Newbie
Joined: 02 February 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1075
|
Posted: 02 November 2006 at 5:17pm |
Definitely VS2005 and .NET 2.0
I'm also not sure if I'm interested in a WinForms toolkit, I would only switch from MFC to WPF, from MFC to WinForms is pointless in my eyes.
Also what is with C++/CLI?
|
Codejock support
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Shragel
Groupie
Joined: 15 May 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 47
|
Posted: 02 November 2006 at 6:48pm |
Only using VB6
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
JamesH
Senior Member
Joined: 01 December 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 147
|
Posted: 06 November 2006 at 12:20pm |
Using VC 6! We switched over to CodeJock from Infragistics specifically because they stopped supporting their ocx controls...
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Shragel
Groupie
Joined: 15 May 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 47
|
Posted: 06 November 2006 at 2:15pm |
Hopefully its not going to happen here.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
SuperMario
Admin Group
Joined: 14 February 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 18057
|
Posted: 06 November 2006 at 4:34pm |
No, it won't happen here
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Shragel
Groupie
Joined: 15 May 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 47
|
Posted: 06 November 2006 at 6:58pm |
Thats good. We invested alot of time in this because its still in com.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
tobi
Senior Member
Joined: 09 September 2004
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 451
|
Posted: 08 November 2006 at 5:15am |
I would expect a control suite with same functionality of XtremeToolkit to ease porting ! Design time designers would be great !!!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
fwhite
Newbie
Joined: 13 April 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 5
|
Posted: 13 November 2006 at 3:55pm |
VC 6, and hope to continue to do so.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
EdwinSchild
Newbie
Joined: 03 December 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 4
|
Posted: 20 November 2006 at 5:30am |
Docking is the most important feature since that is missing in WinForms
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
MNovaro
Groupie
Joined: 20 June 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 71
|
Posted: 24 November 2006 at 5:40am |
Right now, VB6 only
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
hipopotamo
Groupie
Joined: 01 June 2006
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 34
|
Posted: 14 December 2006 at 2:00pm |
Hi,
We still use Visual Studio 6.0.
My answer is 2002.
But I pool the wrong one. 2005 :-(
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
hipopotamo
Groupie
Joined: 01 June 2006
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 34
|
Posted: 14 December 2006 at 2:11pm |
Hi again,
The main reason we choose CodeJock its because VC 6.0 support ![](https://forum.codejock.com/smileys/smiley32.gif)
So it would be very, very sad news if Codejock stop supporting this platform
Regards
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Philip
Newbie
Joined: 25 November 2006
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
Points: 28
|
Posted: 20 December 2006 at 8:12pm |
Visual Studio 6.0
The costs in higher versions are grater than the benefits (high resources needed, slow running).
Our clients don't pay us for .Net, they pay us for fast solutions to their needs, and vb6 can do it for the next 10 years.
|
BORG Design - Sultanescu Philip
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
flauzer
Senior Member
Joined: 30 December 2003
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 108
|
Posted: 22 December 2006 at 12:08pm |
Visual Studio 6.0 (only) for Windows programs
VS2005 and .NET 2.0 for WEB
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
tommylov
Groupie
Joined: 09 January 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 20
|
Posted: 09 January 2007 at 2:53pm |
Yes, I'm still using VS2002.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
asifimam
Newbie
Joined: 20 December 2006
Location: Pakistan
Status: Offline
Points: 6
|
Posted: 31 January 2007 at 3:15am |
VS-2005 for both 32 and 64 bit platforms. We are just waiting to buy 64-bit compliant ActiveX controls.
|
Debug till Nobug
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
EdwinSchild
Newbie
Joined: 03 December 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 4
|
Posted: 31 January 2007 at 5:19am |
We didn't renew our maintenance because Codejock couldn't make any statement about 64-bits and we desperately need it.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Simon HB9DRV
Senior Member
Joined: 07 July 2005
Location: Switzerland
Status: Offline
Points: 458
|
Posted: 31 January 2007 at 6:16am |
FWIW I use Visual Studio 6.0 with C++, I hope this will be supported for a long time to come (please).
|
Simon HB9DRV
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
SuperMario
Admin Group
Joined: 14 February 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 18057
|
Posted: 01 February 2007 at 12:20pm |
EdwinSchild wrote:
We didn't renew our maintenance because Codejock couldn't make any statement about 64-bits and we desperately need it. |
Use VS 2005 to compile in 64 bit. It will work.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
EdwinSchild
Newbie
Joined: 03 December 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 4
|
Posted: 01 February 2007 at 1:12pm |
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Shragel
Groupie
Joined: 15 May 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 47
|
Posted: 01 February 2007 at 3:13pm |
:)
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
fabioraciti
Newbie
Joined: 07 March 2007
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 1
|
Posted: 05 April 2007 at 12:54pm |
vc2005
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
daveED
Newbie
Joined: 16 August 2006
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 37
|
Posted: 10 April 2007 at 6:52am |
VB 2003 & now using VB 2005
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
joeliner
Senior Member
Joined: 09 June 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 273
|
Posted: 10 April 2007 at 8:24am |
Visual Basic 6.0(since we have to support our existing systems)
rolling over to VS 2005 for all our new products.
|
Product: Xtreme SuitePro (ActiveX) version 13.1
Platform: Windows XP SP 3
Language: Visual Basic 6 SP6
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
JohnCrenshaw
Groupie
Joined: 08 September 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 65
|
Posted: 10 April 2007 at 3:06pm |
I'm using VS 2005 but I have some strong feelings on this issue. Companies that don't HAVE to use 2005 (for Unicode debugging or something) are wise to stick with 6.0. 2005 was a HUGE step backwards, and ultimately decreases efficiency. Many key features that worked great in 6.0 vanished sometime before 2005 made it out the door and made things much worse.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
gshawn
Senior Member
Joined: 04 October 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 227
|
Posted: 10 April 2007 at 9:21pm |
VB 6.0 for all existing products, VS 2005 for one or two new ones
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
yair-edsoft
Newbie
Joined: 14 April 2007
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 14
|
Posted: 14 April 2007 at 11:43am |
We are using VB6.0
New Product VS2005
|
yair
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
yair-edsoft
Newbie
Joined: 14 April 2007
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 14
|
Posted: 14 April 2007 at 11:43am |
We are using VB6.0
New Products VS2005
|
yair
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Raver
Newbie
Joined: 13 June 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 7
|
Posted: 13 June 2007 at 1:32pm |
VC 6
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Metodo_Sviluppo
Groupie
Joined: 02 September 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 43
|
Posted: 20 June 2007 at 4:04am |
VB6
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Rhogan
Newbie
Joined: 16 March 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 26
|
Posted: 26 June 2007 at 9:32pm |
Pure C++ using VS2005
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
faizullah
Newbie
Joined: 31 July 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 8
|
Posted: 03 August 2007 at 10:27am |
We are using visual studio 2003 and using vb.net. But I couldn't make the skinframe working in vb.net form. Do you have any sample code to do that?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
SuperMario
Admin Group
Joined: 14 February 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 18057
|
Posted: 10 August 2007 at 12:00pm |
faizullah wrote:
We are using visual studio 2003 and using vb.net. But I couldn't make the skinframe working in vb.net form. Do you have any sample code to do that? |
You can do something like this, just make sure the styles folder path is correct: Private Sub frmMain_Load(ByVal eventSender As System.Object, ByVal eventArgs As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load Dim skinFolder As String skinFolder = System.IO.Path.GetDirectoryName(Application.ExecutablePath) + "\..\..\..\Styles\" SkinFramework.LoadSkin(skinFolder + "Office2007.cjstyles", "NormalAqua.ini") ... ... ... End Sub Private Sub frmMain_VisibleChanged(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.VisibleChanged If Me.Visible Then SkinFramework.ApplyWindow(Me.Handle.ToInt32()) Me.BackColor = SkinFramework.GetColor(XtremeSkinFramework.XTPColorManagerColor.STDCOLOR_BTNFACE) End If End Sub
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
dlt123
Newbie
Joined: 20 September 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 3
|
Posted: 20 September 2007 at 12:18am |
Well I guess I am using Visual Studio 2002 since I am using Visual C++ Studio 6.0 Professional... which brings me to a question I've been pondering. I am learning VS C++ and bought VS 6 Pro a couple of years ago. I never got around to learning C++, but am now. Should I consider getting Visual Studio 2005 Pro, if so why? I would rather take the funds and get the CodeJock Xtreme ToolkitPro. Is VS 2005 that much better then VS 6.0? Am I missing something because I am using VS6.0... accept my brain?... ![](smileys/smiley36.gif) Thanks, Dennis
|
Belief has no affect on reality.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |