<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Codejock Developer Community : HOWTO: PX_Double with greater precision</title>
  <link>http://forum.codejock.com/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; Codejock Developer Community : Toolkit Pro : HOWTO: PX_Double with greater precision]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 01:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 03:37:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.04</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>forum.codejock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=9238</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[HOWTO: PX_Double with greater precision : Hi Oleg; Sometimes the obvious...]]></title>
   <link>http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=9238&amp;PID=29951&amp;title=howto-px-double-with-greater-precision#29951</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.codejock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=109">mgampi</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 9238<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2008 at 3:37am<br /><br />Hi Oleg;<DIV>Sometimes the obvious can't be seen <img src="http://forum.codejock.com/smileys/smiley9.gif" border="0">...</DIV><DIV>Thanks for your help to direct me to the simplest solution!</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 03:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=9238&amp;PID=29951&amp;title=howto-px-double-with-greater-precision#29951</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[HOWTO: PX_Double with greater precision : Hi,  As workaround you can manually...]]></title>
   <link>http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=9238&amp;PID=29937&amp;title=howto-px-double-with-greater-precision#29937</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.codejock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=6851">Oleg</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 9238<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 08 January 2008 at 1:53am<br /><br />Hi,<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>As workaround you can manually convert to/from string and store PX_String.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=9238&amp;PID=29937&amp;title=howto-px-double-with-greater-precision#29937</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[HOWTO: PX_Double with greater precision : Hi; I&amp;#039;m using PX_Double...]]></title>
   <link>http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=9238&amp;PID=29918&amp;title=howto-px-double-with-greater-precision#29918</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.codejock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=109">mgampi</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 9238<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 07 January 2008 at 5:57am<br /><br />Hi;<DIV>I'm using PX_Double to store/retrieve measured data to/from XML files. As I see in source code of XTPropExchange.cpp the conversion to/from double uses the %g format specifier. Normally this should result in a double string to represent the value 'as compact as possible'. But in my case this leads to unwantes results.</DIV><DIV>E.g. if I store a -DBL_MAX (which is defined as -1.7976931348623158e+308) the result string is -1.79769e+308. This can't no longer be compared by using DBL_EPSILON (defined as 2.2204460492503131e-016).</DIV><DIV>So my questions are:</DIV><DIV>a) How can I increase the precision of double values for storing/retrieving to/from XML files when using the core XT toolkit?</DIV><DIV>or</DIV><DIV>b) How can I write my own PX_xxxx exchange functions to not touch the source of the current toolkit (11.2.2)?</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=9238&amp;PID=29918&amp;title=howto-px-double-with-greater-precision#29918</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>