http://forum.codejock.com/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Sat, 04 Apr 2026 01:33:30 +0000 Sun, 16 Dec 2007 13:50:21 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 forum.codejock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=9085 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_images/codejock-logo.gif http://forum.codejock.com/ http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=9085&PID=29498&title=wpf-toolkit#29498 Author: pierremf
Subject: 9085
Posted: 16 December 2007 at 1:50pm

I agree: WPF will not become mainstream UI framework for some time. As far as I know, many end users are still under XP. WPF runs really slowly under XP.

On the other hand, when I see the XBAP demo of xceed.com WPF datagrid...

It is really a tough choice for a new app: MFC ? Winform ? WPF ?

]]> Sun, 16 Dec 2007 13:50:21 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=9085&PID=29498&title=wpf-toolkit#29498 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=9085&PID=29389&title=wpf-toolkit#29389 Author: ABuenger
Subject: 9085
Posted: 12 December 2007 at 2:40pm

It would be great if you could share your experiences you've made yet during the development of the WPF toolkit.

What CPU/GPU is required to get a performance on par with your MFC toolkit?

Any major problems? Interoperability with your MFC controls?

From my own experiences and from the general feedback on the Yahoo! WPF messenger I'm not convinced that WPF will become the mainstream UI framework for some time to come.

Some people mentioned that the performance became better with Vista SP1, have you seen the same for your components?

]]> Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:40:53 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=9085&PID=29389&title=wpf-toolkit#29389