<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Codejock Developer Community : SyntaxEdit v Scintilla</title>
  <link>http://forum.codejock.com/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; Codejock Developer Community : Syntax Edit : SyntaxEdit v Scintilla]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 03:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:51:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.04</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>forum.codejock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=8512</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[SyntaxEdit v Scintilla : I have to agree here. At the moment...]]></title>
   <link>http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8512&amp;PID=28092&amp;title=syntaxedit-v-scintilla#28092</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.codejock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=2198">znakeeye</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 8512<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 05 November 2007 at 10:51am<br /><br />I have to agree here. At the moment Scintilla outperforms SE and also provides some features that SE lacks (such as a runtime tokenizer for syntax coloring).<DIV></DIV><DIV></DIV>SE has great potential. Sure hope that SE will be as good in the end.<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Like keithm said, what does the roadmap look like for SE?</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8512&amp;PID=28092&amp;title=syntaxedit-v-scintilla#28092</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[SyntaxEdit v Scintilla : We use Codejock and think it a...]]></title>
   <link>http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8512&amp;PID=27605&amp;title=syntaxedit-v-scintilla#27605</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.codejock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=2974">keithm</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 8512<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 24 October 2007 at 5:48am<br /><br /><DIV>We use Codejock and think it a cracking product but currently SyntaxEdit is lacking in several features that are really crucial to a good user experience as well as development needs;&nbsp;features&nbsp;such as "intellisense" and dynamic configuration.&nbsp;We are, as I'm sure are many others, looking at scintilla. Scintilla provides just about everything out of the box and is easily tweaked but it can't compete with&nbsp;the Codejock support. We would like to use SE but we (and I'm sure many others on the fourm)&nbsp;need to&nbsp;know&nbsp;what the roadmap is for future feature additions so that we can plan our development. </DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=8512&amp;PID=27605&amp;title=syntaxedit-v-scintilla#27605</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>