Codejock Developer Community : Digitally Signed DLL http://forum.codejock.com/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Sat, 04 Apr 2026 11:18:59 +0000 Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:21:27 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 forum.codejock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=6545 <![CDATA[Codejock Developer Community]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_images/codejock-logo.gif http://forum.codejock.com/ <![CDATA[Digitally Signed DLL : Okay, I think that should be okay...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20897&title=digitally-signed-dll#20897 Author: thodgson
Subject: 6545
Posted: 05 March 2007 at 8:21am

Okay, I think that should be okay considering your product is "like" custom code.  I don't think Microsoft will scrutinize it too much.]]> Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:21:27 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20897&title=digitally-signed-dll#20897 <![CDATA[Digitally Signed DLL : I see. As solution now,...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20889&title=digitally-signed-dll#20889 Author: Oleg
Subject: 6545
Posted: 05 March 2007 at 6:57am

 
I see.
 
As solution now, you can change company name in Workspace\ToolkitPro\ToolkitPro.rc , rebuild and sign it yourself.  or use static build
We will think what can be done.
]]> Mon, 05 Mar 2007 06:57:13 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20889&title=digitally-signed-dll#20889 <![CDATA[Digitally Signed DLL : ABuenger is correct: I mean that...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20888&title=digitally-signed-dll#20888 Author: thodgson
Subject: 6545
Posted: 05 March 2007 at 6:08am

ABuenger is correct: I mean that I build a single Release DLL myself, which is distributed to all customers.  That one DLL needs to be signed.
 
]]> Mon, 05 Mar 2007 06:08:46 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20888&title=digitally-signed-dll#20888 <![CDATA[Digitally Signed DLL : oleg wrote:btw, so you send...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20887&title=digitally-signed-dll#20887 Author: ABuenger
Subject: 6545
Posted: 05 March 2007 at 5:10am

Originally posted by oleg oleg wrote:

btw, so you send toolkit sources to your customers???


I guess he meant that your (Codejock) customers are building the DLLs themself.

I suggest that you make signed release DLLs available for download. These DLLs should also be the only ones distributed to clients, DLLs built from modified sources should have a different name or linked statically.

]]> Mon, 05 Mar 2007 05:10:06 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20887&title=digitally-signed-dll#20887 <![CDATA[Digitally Signed DLL : Hi, How we can be sure that customer/you...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20884&title=digitally-signed-dll#20884 Author: Oleg
Subject: 6545
Posted: 05 March 2007 at 2:06am

Hi,

How we can be sure that customer/you didn't modify sources...
It can't work this way, you have sign dll yourself or build statically.
 
btw, so you send toolkit sources to your customers???
]]> Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:06:01 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20884&title=digitally-signed-dll#20884 <![CDATA[Digitally Signed DLL : oleg wrote:Hi, We sign our...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20875&title=digitally-signed-dll#20875 Author: thodgson
Subject: 6545
Posted: 04 March 2007 at 7:45am

Originally posted by oleg oleg wrote:

Hi,
We sign our ocx files for ActiveX verrsion, but how do you want we sign dlls you build manually?
 
Since each customer builds the DLL, we send the Toolkit DLL to you, you digitally sign the DLL, then you send it back.
]]> Sun, 04 Mar 2007 07:45:27 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20875&title=digitally-signed-dll#20875 <![CDATA[Digitally Signed DLL : Hi, You can build application...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20865&title=digitally-signed-dll#20865 Author: Oleg
Subject: 6545
Posted: 04 March 2007 at 3:06am

Hi,
You can build application with statically linked toolkit and don't distribute additionall dlls.
 
We sign our ocx files for ActiveX verrsion, but how do you want we sign dlls you build manually?
]]> Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:06:23 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20865&title=digitally-signed-dll#20865 <![CDATA[Digitally Signed DLL : We are working on having our product,...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20841&title=digitally-signed-dll#20841 Author: thodgson
Subject: 6545
Posted: 01 March 2007 at 5:51pm

We are working on having our product, which uses the Toolkit, certified for Windows Vista.  One of the requirements is to have all DLLs digitally signed (authenticode). 

Even though, we compile from the source code, the version information on the DLL bears the company name CodeJock. 
 
Does CodeJock provide a way to digitially sign the DLL for us?  Anyone else dealing with this issue?
 
]]> Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:51:35 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6545&PID=20841&title=digitally-signed-dll#20841