http://forum.codejock.com/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Wed, 13 May 2026 13:12:00 +0000 Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:57:21 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 forum.codejock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=6094 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_images/codejock-logo.gif http://forum.codejock.com/ http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19876&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19876 Author: akur
Subject: 6094
Posted: 30 January 2007 at 8:57am

Thank you. Indeed, this has been fixed in v10.4.2, very quickly.]]> Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:57:21 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19876&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19876 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19633&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19633 Author: Oleg
Subject: 6094
Posted: 23 January 2007 at 11:23am

Thanks, These suggested lines will be added for next release.]]> Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:23:03 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19633&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19633 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19619&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19619 Author: akur
Subject: 6094
Posted: 23 January 2007 at 7:05am

Yeah, sorry. I meant January. Anyway, maintaining our software versions I sometimes feel just like in a time machine...
]]> Tue, 23 Jan 2007 07:05:34 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19619&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19619 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19618&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19618 Author: ABuenger
Subject: 6094
Posted: 23 January 2007 at 6:57am

akur wrote: released Feb 19th, 2007.

Back to the future?

]]> Tue, 23 Jan 2007 06:57:23 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19618&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19618 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19617&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19617 Author: akur
Subject: 6094
Posted: 23 January 2007 at 5:10am

I'm somewhat sad to see that this bug has neither been removed in 10.4.1, released Jan 19th, 2007. [post edited]]]> Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:10:13 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19617&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19617 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19505&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19505 Author: akur
Subject: 6094
Posted: 19 January 2007 at 7:36am

Just found it. I guess these extra conditions are missing from
void CXTPDockingPaneContext::UpdateStickyFrame(CRect& rectDragFrame, CWnd* pHost) :

    if (abs(rectDragFrame.bottom - rcWork.bottom) < nGap)
    {
        rectDragFrame.OffsetRect(0, rcWork.bottom - rectDragFrame.bottom);
    }
    if (abs(rectDragFrame.top - rcWork.top) < nGap)
    {
        rectDragFrame.OffsetRect(0, rcWork.top - rectDragFrame.top);
    }

Could it be fixed in the next maintenance release, please?

]]> Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:36:26 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19505&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19505 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19499&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19499 Author: akur
Subject: 6094
Posted: 19 January 2007 at 5:09am

To say it more precisely:
Panes' top doesn't stick to mainframe's top
   AND
Panes' bottom doesn't stick to mainframe's bottom.
]]> Fri, 19 Jan 2007 05:09:47 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19499&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19499 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19228&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19228 Author: akur
Subject: 6094
Posted: 12 January 2007 at 6:18am

Hello,

I've noticed that floating sticky frames don't have the same behaviour in all 4 directions. When trying to stick a pane to horizontal/vertical sides of mainframe, I get a successful snapping when dragging a pane inwards horizontally, outwards horizontally, and inwards vertically (PaneSample):

But I do not get any snapping if I drag the pane outwards vertically:

I guess this is not by design and maybe is worth correction. What do you think about this?

Thank you, in advance!

]]> Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:18:50 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=6094&PID=19228&title=sticky-frames-nonsticky-direction#19228