Codejock Developer Community : Codejock still alive? http://forum.codejock.com/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Mon, 20 Apr 2026 01:34:40 +0000 Tue, 03 Mar 2015 06:09:40 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 forum.codejock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=22546 <![CDATA[Codejock Developer Community]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_images/codejock-logo.gif http://forum.codejock.com/ <![CDATA[Codejock still alive? : Sounds fair! Waiting for the upcoming...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73136&title=codejock-still-alive#73136 Author: xang
Subject: 22546
Posted: 03 March 2015 at 6:09am

Sounds fair! Waiting for the upcoming release then.
]]> Tue, 03 Mar 2015 06:09:40 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73136&title=codejock-still-alive#73136 <![CDATA[Codejock still alive? : When we run Beta 1 this time around...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73134&title=codejock-still-alive#73134 Author: kstowell
Subject: 22546
Posted: 02 March 2015 at 2:48pm

When we run Beta 1 this time around it should not take longer than 2 or 3 weeks.  If no major problems are found we will do an official release after that.  The only exception I can see to this would be if something major was found or we have an incomplete feature that we need to finish.  In this case we would will probably run a second beta before releasing. The whole beta process should not take more than 6 weeks total.]]> Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:48:55 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73134&title=codejock-still-alive#73134 <![CDATA[Codejock still alive? : Thank you Kirk!That sounds good...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73132&title=codejock-still-alive#73132 Author: Alex H.
Subject: 22546
Posted: 02 March 2015 at 10:26am

Thank you Kirk!

That sounds good for me :-)
But could you please also release a new stable service pack 16.4.1 soon?

Last time it took about 5 months between 16.4 BETA1 and the Release.
This is by far too long for us to wait.

]]> Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:26:16 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73132&title=codejock-still-alive#73132 <![CDATA[Codejock still alive? : Hi everyone, and thank you for...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73131&title=codejock-still-alive#73131 Author: kstowell
Subject: 22546
Posted: 02 March 2015 at 9:02am

Hi everyone, and thank you for your concern and comments here, they are very much appreciated.  Yes we are still very much alive and working hard on the next major release.  We have some pretty exciting things in the works for 2015 and hope to have a beta available within just a few weeks.  We have some major improvements to the Calendar, Themes, and Skin Framework to name a few and will be introducing some great new features later this year including some nice updates to the Chart control and Application Wizards.

We appreciate your concerns and assure you that we are working hard to make 2015 a turnaround year.  We appreciate your patience and hope to bring you some great improvements throughout this year.
]]> Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:02:52 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73131&title=codejock-still-alive#73131 <![CDATA[Codejock still alive? : DavidH wrote:has anyone tried...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73122&title=codejock-still-alive#73122 Author: Marco1
Subject: 22546
Posted: 27 February 2015 at 7:30pm

Originally posted by DavidH DavidH wrote:

has anyone tried BCGSoft (their MFC libraries), and is it any good?
No, they suck. At least their controls does. Calandar contol is not even close to CJ ones.
I evaluated BCG, but in the moment it's far from being a real alternative.

Kirk, if you read this:
Possible for CJ would be to make the code open source (on github) and have a concept with a license for commercial usage and professional customer support.
Ext JS (later Sencha) showed, how successful this model works!
So the community can directly help to improve the product. Just a thought.

]]> Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:30:37 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73122&title=codejock-still-alive#73122 <![CDATA[Codejock still alive? : Yes Codejock please let us know...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73112&title=codejock-still-alive#73112 Author: Alex H.
Subject: 22546
Posted: 26 February 2015 at 6:36am

Yes Codejock please let us know when the next version will arrive?
The 16.4 was released more than 4 months ago!
Any plans for a service Pack or 16.4.1?
]]> Thu, 26 Feb 2015 06:36:52 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73112&title=codejock-still-alive#73112 <![CDATA[Codejock still alive? : I asked the same question directly...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73110&title=codejock-still-alive#73110 Author: cpede
Subject: 22546
Posted: 26 February 2015 at 3:54am

I asked the same question directly to support, but I did not get any answer at all.

I think that we deserve an answer from CodeJock here. We are all software coders 
and know all about the hassle delivering software at deadlines, not reaching goals
etc. And I have been  a customer from the beginning, where it started out as free
to a payed supported product.

So CodeJock just be fair to us, what are your plans, and how can we help?

-cpede
]]> Thu, 26 Feb 2015 03:54:42 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73110&title=codejock-still-alive#73110 <![CDATA[Codejock still alive? : There&#039;s hardly any news or...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73107&title=codejock-still-alive#73107 Author: DavidH
Subject: 22546
Posted: 25 February 2015 at 5:20am

There's hardly any news or software updates.

I have recently renewed, but I'm getting doubts if it's still worth it if nothing happens.

David.
]]> Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:20:59 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22546&PID=73107&title=codejock-still-alive#73107