<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="https://syndication.webwiz.net/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>Codejock Developer Community : Suggestion to enhance AddRecordEx</title>
  <link>http://forum.codejock.com/</link>
  <description><![CDATA[This is an XML content feed of; Codejock Developer Community : Report Control : Suggestion to enhance AddRecordEx]]></description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 22:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 01:16:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 12.04</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>forum.codejock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=21892</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Suggestion to enhance AddRecordEx : Just checked v18.0.1.Still not...]]></title>
   <link>http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=21892&amp;PID=76206&amp;title=suggestion-to-enhance-addrecordex#76206</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.codejock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=109">mgampi</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 21892<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 12 October 2017 at 1:16am<br /><br />Just checked v18.0.1.<br>Still not implemented! <img src="http://forum.codejock.com/smileys/smiley19.gif" border="0" alt="Cry" title="Cry" /><img src="http://forum.codejock.com/smileys/smiley19.gif" border="0" alt="Cry" title="Cry" /><img src="http://forum.codejock.com/smileys/smiley19.gif" border="0" alt="Cry" title="Cry" /><img src="http://forum.codejock.com/smileys/smiley19.gif" border="0" alt="Cry" title="Cry" /><img src="http://forum.codejock.com/smileys/smiley19.gif" border="0" alt="Cry" title="Cry" />]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 01:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=21892&amp;PID=76206&amp;title=suggestion-to-enhance-addrecordex#76206</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title><![CDATA[Suggestion to enhance AddRecordEx : Hi;Could you please change the...]]></title>
   <link>http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=21892&amp;PID=71626&amp;title=suggestion-to-enhance-addrecordex#71626</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://forum.codejock.com/member_profile.asp?PF=109">mgampi</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 21892<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23 September 2013 at 3:42pm<br /><br />Hi;<br><br>Could you please change the return type of CXTPReportControl::AddRecordEx() from<br><table width="99%"><tr><td><pre class="BBcode">virtual <strong>void</strong> CXTPReportControl::AddRecordEx(...)</pre></td></tr></table><br>to<br><table width="99%"><tr><td><pre class="BBcode">virtual <strong><font color="#CC0000">CXTPReportRow*</font></strong> CXTPReportControl::AddRecordEx(...)</pre></td></tr></table><br>and return the newly created row!<br>Searching for the row(s) is no real option when considering performance (CXTPReportRows::Find(CXTPReportRecord*) uses a <strong>linear</strong> search to find the record. Inserting four records in a collection of 1000 rows results in <strong>worst case in 4000 compare</strong> operations).<br><br>This enhancement would ease the task of selecting rows that are inserted into the control using that way without any additional search run.<br>I don't want to duplicate the code of AddRecordEx() to get the same result.<br><br><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=21892&amp;PID=71626&amp;title=suggestion-to-enhance-addrecordex#71626</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>