Codejock Developer Community : Deployment for 64bits OS http://forum.codejock.com/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Thu, 16 Apr 2026 23:25:09 +0000 Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:02:07 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 forum.codejock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=20021 <![CDATA[Codejock Developer Community]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_images/codejock-logo.gif http://forum.codejock.com/ <![CDATA[Deployment for 64bits OS : Which version do you use? ]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=20021&PID=68780&title=deployment-for-64bits-os#68780 Author: SuperMario
Subject: 20021
Posted: 20 August 2012 at 10:02am

Which version do you use?]]> Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:02:07 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=20021&PID=68780&title=deployment-for-64bits-os#68780 <![CDATA[Deployment for 64bits OS : When deploying the skin framework...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=20021&PID=68709&title=deployment-for-64bits-os#68709 Author: Edwig
Subject: 20021
Posted: 07 August 2012 at 7:19am

When deploying the skin framework in a  standard MS visual studio 2010 deployment project,
we tried using the supported MSM merge modules as in the "Codejock.Skinframework.x64.vx.y.z.msm" files. It's a very fast way of building installers Smile
 
When deployed in this way the 64 bits versions do not work.
Spying the *.MSM codejock files with the microsoft ORCA tools, we found out that the standard Unicode and ANSI 32bits versions contain registry settings for the codejock components, wheras the 64 bits versions don't. Confused
 
By supplying all registry settings by hand, we got a working situation. but this strikes me as a serious bug for working with merge modules. Angry
 
Or are we missing something here?Question
]]> Tue, 07 Aug 2012 07:19:03 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=20021&PID=68709&title=deployment-for-64bits-os#68709