Codejock Developer Community : CXTPMarkupContext local image manager SAFE TO USE? http://forum.codejock.com/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Mon, 20 Apr 2026 20:16:44 +0000 Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:01:41 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 forum.codejock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=18017 <![CDATA[Codejock Developer Community]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_images/codejock-logo.gif http://forum.codejock.com/ <![CDATA[CXTPMarkupContext local image manager SAFE TO USE? : I see. I checked the release notes...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=66018&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#66018 Author: MacW
Subject: 18017
Posted: 24 August 2011 at 9:01am

I see. I checked the release notes but there was no mention of any change.

I do not install every XTP update for deployment reasons so I could no t search the source codes for changes you may have made or not.]]> Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:01:41 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=66018&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#66018 <![CDATA[CXTPMarkupContext local image manager SAFE TO USE? : There isSetImageManager at least...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=66011&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#66011 Author: Oleg
Subject: 18017
Posted: 24 August 2011 at 8:02am

There is SetImageManager at least in15.1.2 / 15.1.3.]]> Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:02:14 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=66011&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#66011 <![CDATA[CXTPMarkupContext local image manager SAFE TO USE? : Hi Oleg,Please do so. I&#039;m...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=65996&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#65996 Author: MacW
Subject: 18017
Posted: 23 August 2011 at 7:17am

Hi Oleg,

Please do so. I'm waiting for this. Still open in the latest version.

Thanks.
]]> Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:17:21 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=65996&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#65996 <![CDATA[CXTPMarkupContext local image manager SAFE TO USE? : btw guess you are right that better...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=63217&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#63217 Author: Oleg
Subject: 18017
Posted: 10 March 2011 at 5:34am

btw guess you are right that better to add public method with description, I'm adding new SetImageManager, after upgrade please use it instead.

Thanks
]]> Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:34:19 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=63217&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#63217 <![CDATA[CXTPMarkupContext local image manager SAFE TO USE? : This would not help because I...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=63215&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#63215 Author: MacW
Subject: 18017
Posted: 09 March 2011 at 6:30pm

This would not help because I actually don't want to use the global image manager because I don't want to pollute the image manager identifier space.]]> Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:30:59 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=63215&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#63215 <![CDATA[CXTPMarkupContext local image manager SAFE TO USE? : Hi, Olegyes, as I wrote, I &#034;new&#034;...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=63214&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#63214 Author: MacW
Subject: 18017
Posted: 09 March 2011 at 6:29pm

Hi, Oleg

yes, as I wrote, I "new" the instance in my code. But I just wanted to make sure that you don't drop the variable in a future release. This is all undocumented (as too often) and there are no methods to initialize the member properly.

Using the global image manager is not always an option, especially since every bitmap needs a globally unique id. Using the local image manager avoids polluting the global image manager.
]]> Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:29:40 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=63214&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#63214 <![CDATA[CXTPMarkupContext local image manager SAFE TO USE? : Hi Oleg,Why he can not use the...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=63203&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#63203 Author: jimmy
Subject: 18017
Posted: 09 March 2011 at 11:46am

Hi Oleg,

Why he can not use the global ImageManager ?
->m_pImageManager = XTPImageManager();
->m_pImageManager->InternalAddRef();

  Jimmy

]]> Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:46:56 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=63203&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#63203 <![CDATA[CXTPMarkupContext local image manager SAFE TO USE? : Hello,yes, its safe, but you assign...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=63200&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#63200 Author: Oleg
Subject: 18017
Posted: 09 March 2011 at 11:33am

Hello,

yes, its safe, but you assign new CXTPImageManager created duynamically

->m_pImageManager = new CXTPImageManager();

]]> Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:33:36 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=63200&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#63200 <![CDATA[CXTPMarkupContext local image manager SAFE TO USE? : In a large application it is pretty...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=63173&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#63173 Author: MacW
Subject: 18017
Posted: 08 March 2011 at 5:44am

In a large application it is pretty hard to associate a unique "command id" with any bitmaps added to the global XTPImageManager() instance.

I noticed that the CXTPMarkupContext  has a local image manager instance (m_pImageManager) declared public. This instance is apparently never initialized (no methods found). But the markup image class checks this instance first before checking the global image manager.

I hence new the m_pImageManager in my code when I want to work with "local" bitmaps only valid in this markup context. The markup context releases the m_pImageManager automatically in the destructor.

Is this SAFE to use or does Codejock plan to remove this variable in a future update. As usual none of this is documented and I don't want to rely on guesswork.

Perhaps you can make this more official by adding a proper method to CXTPMarkupContext to create its own image manager...


]]> Tue, 08 Mar 2011 05:44:31 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=18017&PID=63173&title=cxtpmarkupcontext-local-image-manager-safe-to-use#63173