Codejock Developer Community : Latest source still buggy http://forum.codejock.com/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Sat, 18 Apr 2026 18:34:53 +0000 Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:03:58 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 forum.codejock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=15018 <![CDATA[Codejock Developer Community]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_images/codejock-logo.gif http://forum.codejock.com/ <![CDATA[Latest source still buggy : At the time I created the topic,...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52339&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52339 Author: znakeeye
Subject: 15018
Posted: 24 August 2009 at 9:03am

At the time I created the topic, the latest source had these problems. Please note that without a versioning system (trunk or similar), it's hard to know exactly which version I've got. Etc etc.

The original problem had nothing to do with my application.]]> Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:03:58 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52339&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52339 <![CDATA[Latest source still buggy : Specially when you usetitle Topic:...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52322&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52322 Author: mdoubson
Subject: 15018
Posted: 23 August 2009 at 1:38pm

Specially when you use title Topic: Latest source still buggy just because your app has some problem... ]]> Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:38:00 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52322&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52322 <![CDATA[Latest source still buggy : Ok, it works now. You can close...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52321&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52321 Author: znakeeye
Subject: 15018
Posted: 23 August 2009 at 1:35pm

Ok, it works now. You can close this until further notice :)]]> Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:35:09 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52321&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52321 <![CDATA[Latest source still buggy : Jason and me made VB case with...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52311&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52311 Author: mdoubson
Subject: 15018
Posted: 22 August 2009 at 10:30am

Jason and me made VB case with 2 forms - one 100% based on Core support for DD, 2nd - ignore Core and react itself (in VB code) on notifications:
ReportControl1_DragOverRecords and ReportControl1_RecordsDropped.  Both cases give identical positive results.
 
See the diference - XTP_NM_REPORT_RECORDS_DROPPED - Jason - reaction AFTER Core one (Customization)

and your case - XTP_NM_REPORT_RECORDS_DROP - reaction INSTEAD of Core!

.....................................................................................................
if (SendNotifyMessage(XTP_NM_REPORT_DROP, (NMHDR*)&nmData) == -1)

{

CMDTARGET_RELEASE(pDropRecords);

return FALSE;

}

nInsert = pTargetRecord->GetIndex();

if (!bAbove)

nInsert++;

GetRecords()->Move(nInsert, pDropRecords);

Populate();

_SelectRows(pDropRecords);

RedrawControl();

SendNotifyMessage(XTP_NM_REPORT_RECORDS_DROPPED, (NMHDR*)&nmData);

CMDTARGET_RELEASE(pDropRecords);

CMDTARGET_RELEASE(pTargetRecord);

return FALSE;

]]> Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:30:31 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52311&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52311 <![CDATA[Latest source still buggy : I think I know what&#039;s causing...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52309&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52309 Author: znakeeye
Subject: 15018
Posted: 22 August 2009 at 8:57am

I think I know what's causing the strange behavior I'm talking about. In my project I must convert dropped records to other types of records (the two report controls are incompatible, so to speak). To accomplish this I handle XTP_NM_REPORT_DROP and inside the handler I re-populate the list of records with the new type of records! Something like this (from memory):

// Create a list of new records, compatible with this report control.
...
pItemNotify->pRecords->RemoveAll(); // I believe this call somehow interferes with underlying CJ code. Removing this call yields correct behavior (except that I get too many records)!
 
for (int i = 0; i < count; ++i)
    pItemNotify->pRecords->Add(pNewRecord);
 
 
I investigated this yesterday, and soon realized I could not reproduce this problem. I will try the latest source tonight and see if I can find the exact pattern.
 
Until then, please take a look at your XTP_NM_REPORT_DROP notification message. It could be the culprit!
]]> Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:57:30 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52309&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52309 <![CDATA[Latest source still buggy : OK - I made for you sample where...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52300&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52300 Author: mdoubson
Subject: 15018
Posted: 21 August 2009 at 4:20pm

OK - I made for you sample where there is no header and footer rows until you turn it with menu - help - header-footer
 
https://forum.codejock.com/uploads/DemoVersion/ReportPaneViewStaticMod.rar
 
Please try
]]> Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:20:00 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52300&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52300 <![CDATA[Latest source still buggy : Lol... header row explains it!...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52299&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52299 Author: znakeeye
Subject: 15018
Posted: 21 August 2009 at 3:45pm

Lol... header row explains it! :P

However, in my project I really have the problem described in the first post. I must create a sample for you to debug! Let me get back to you on this.
]]> Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:45:57 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52299&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52299 <![CDATA[Latest source still buggy : Vista show same proper behaviour...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52298&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52298 Author: mdoubson
Subject: 15018
Posted: 21 August 2009 at 2:14pm

Vista show same proper behaviour - see snapshots
uploads/20090821_141456_StepsVista.rar
]]> Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:14:00 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52298&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52298 <![CDATA[Latest source still buggy : Thanks - we are running 100% same...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52291&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52291 Author: mdoubson
Subject: 15018
Posted: 21 August 2009 at 10:11am

Thanks - we are running 100% same code (but I am running XP and you - Vista?) I will switch to Vista later and recheck again)
 It looks strange - I did all your steps in your order...
]]> Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:11:15 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52291&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52291 <![CDATA[Latest source still buggy : 2009-08-20 21:28 ]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52290&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52290 Author: znakeeye
Subject: 15018
Posted: 21 August 2009 at 10:03am

2009-08-20 21:28

]]> Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:03:37 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15018&PID=52290&title=latest-source-still-buggy#52290