Codejock Developer Community : Larger compiled size http://forum.codejock.com/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:43:09 +0000 Wed, 14 May 2008 09:44:25 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 forum.codejock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=10486 <![CDATA[Codejock Developer Community]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_images/codejock-logo.gif http://forum.codejock.com/ <![CDATA[Larger compiled size : Well, a full rebuild didn&#039;t...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=35192&title=larger-compiled-size#35192 Author: dennisV
Subject: 10486
Posted: 14 May 2008 at 9:44am

Well, a full rebuild didn't really help, but I guess it's just the price I'll have to pay for the newer version 

Unless it's supposed to be smaller or the same, then there's a problem?
]]> Wed, 14 May 2008 09:44:25 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=35192&title=larger-compiled-size#35192 <![CDATA[Larger compiled size : oleg wrote:Hi, Are you sure...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=35005&title=larger-compiled-size#35005 Author: dennisV
Subject: 10486
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 4:14am

Originally posted by oleg oleg wrote:

Hi,

Are you sure you rebuild static library - not dynamic ?

Yes, otherwise it would require CJ DLLs to run

One thing I haven't tried is doing a full solution rebuild - maybe that will help. I'll try it tonight.
]]> Fri, 09 May 2008 04:14:50 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=35005&title=larger-compiled-size#35005 <![CDATA[Larger compiled size : Hi, Are you sure you rebuild...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34981&title=larger-compiled-size#34981 Author: Oleg
Subject: 10486
Posted: 09 May 2008 at 1:11am

Hi,

Are you sure you rebuild static library - not dynamic ?
]]> Fri, 09 May 2008 01:11:37 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34981&title=larger-compiled-size#34981 <![CDATA[Larger compiled size : oleg wrote:Hi, Also try...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34973&title=larger-compiled-size#34973 Author: dennisV
Subject: 10486
Posted: 08 May 2008 at 5:49pm

Originally posted by oleg oleg wrote:

Hi,
 
Also try in Source\Common\XTPVersion.h  comment
#define _XTP_INCLUDE_MARKUP
and rebuild lib.

It has actually grown by 10K after that Weird... I'll try to comment out other things as well from there to see if it helps. Is there any other place I can define/undefine/comment out things?

Thanks!
]]> Thu, 08 May 2008 17:49:55 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34973&title=larger-compiled-size#34973 <![CDATA[Larger compiled size : Hi, Also try in Source\Common\XTPVersion.h...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34933&title=larger-compiled-size#34933 Author: Oleg
Subject: 10486
Posted: 08 May 2008 at 9:20am

Hi,
 
Also try in Source\Common\XTPVersion.h  comment
#define _XTP_INCLUDE_MARKUP
and rebuild lib.
]]> Thu, 08 May 2008 09:20:36 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34933&title=larger-compiled-size#34933 <![CDATA[Larger compiled size : znakeeye wrote:I believe...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34926&title=larger-compiled-size#34926 Author: dennisV
Subject: 10486
Posted: 08 May 2008 at 7:35am

Originally posted by znakeeye znakeeye wrote:

I believe the refined 2007-styles requires new images to be added. It's definitely the resource section you should look at!

Maybe I'm not doing it right, but I just can't get the size to go down :(

I've added the following to my stdafx.h before including XTToolkitPro.h *and* also to my .rc2 file before including XTToolkitPro.rc:

#define _XTP_EXCLUDE_SYNTAXEDIT
#define _XTP_EXCLUDE_SHORTCUTBAR
#define _XTP_EXCLUDE_TASKPANEL
#define _XTP_EXCLUDE_RIBBON

these are things I don't use. It is still bigger than the 11.2 compile. Am I looking in the right direction or should I be doing something else?

Thanks!
]]> Thu, 08 May 2008 07:35:47 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34926&title=larger-compiled-size#34926 <![CDATA[Larger compiled size : I believe the refined 2007-styles...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34924&title=larger-compiled-size#34924 Author: znakeeye
Subject: 10486
Posted: 08 May 2008 at 6:58am

I believe the refined 2007-styles requires new images to be added. It's definitely the resource section you should look at!]]> Thu, 08 May 2008 06:58:00 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34924&title=larger-compiled-size#34924 <![CDATA[Larger compiled size : Smucker wrote:To eliminate...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34823&title=larger-compiled-size#34823 Author: dennisV
Subject: 10486
Posted: 06 May 2008 at 7:31pm

Originally posted by Smucker Smucker wrote:

To eliminate unused code, be sure that function-level linking is on for Codejock and your projects. Also you may want to be sure you're only including toolkit resources that you need.


I'll double-check, but I think it's already on. The resources are one area I haven't really checked, so I'll take a look at it. Thanks!
]]> Tue, 06 May 2008 19:31:29 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34823&title=larger-compiled-size#34823 <![CDATA[Larger compiled size : To eliminate unused code, be sure...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34763&title=larger-compiled-size#34763 Author: Smucker
Subject: 10486
Posted: 06 May 2008 at 3:13am

To eliminate unused code, be sure that function-level linking is on for Codejock and your projects. Also you may want to be sure you're only including toolkit resources that you need.

]]> Tue, 06 May 2008 03:13:02 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34763&title=larger-compiled-size#34763 <![CDATA[Larger compiled size : jimmy wrote:Hi,I think the...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34660&title=larger-compiled-size#34660 Author: dennisV
Subject: 10486
Posted: 04 May 2008 at 5:42pm

Originally posted by jimmy jimmy wrote:

Hi,

I think the new markup feature need more size.
If you can exclude this, i don't known.
How do you link ? Static or with Dynamic with CJ DLL.

  Jimmy


Maybe you're right - I'll dig deeper into this.

I'm linking statically.

Thanks,

   Dennis
]]> Sun, 04 May 2008 17:42:45 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10486&PID=34660&title=larger-compiled-size#34660