Codejock Developer Community : SIgnature suggestion for ...::SetValue() http://forum.codejock.com/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Sun, 19 Apr 2026 11:23:08 +0000 Fri, 02 May 2008 08:31:27 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.04 360 forum.codejock.com/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=10450 <![CDATA[Codejock Developer Community]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_images/codejock-logo.gif http://forum.codejock.com/ <![CDATA[SIgnature suggestion for ...::SetValue() : Hello,I also prefered this.But...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10450&PID=34559&title=signature-suggestion-for-setvalue#34559 Author: jimmy
Subject: 10450
Posted: 02 May 2008 at 8:31am

Hello,

I also prefered this.
But Codejock have cange many calls from
Fkt(CString strText) to Fkt(LPCTSTR lpText) and not to
Ftk(const CString& strText).
i don't know why ?
98 percent of CString parameter call in our project come from a other CString and not from a const string "MyText".

  Jimmy

]]> Fri, 02 May 2008 08:31:27 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10450&PID=34559&title=signature-suggestion-for-setvalue#34559 <![CDATA[SIgnature suggestion for ...::SetValue() : Hi, CXTPPropertyGridItem::SetValue...]]> http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10450&PID=34557&title=signature-suggestion-for-setvalue#34557 Author: mgampi
Subject: 10450
Posted: 02 May 2008 at 8:02am

Hi,
 
CXTPPropertyGridItem::SetValue is declared as
 
virtual void CXTPPropertyGridItem::SetValue(CString strValue)
 
I suggest to change it to
 
virtual void CXTPPropertyGridItem::SetValue(const CString& strValue)
]]> Fri, 02 May 2008 08:02:05 +0000 http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=10450&PID=34557&title=signature-suggestion-for-setvalue#34557