To Remove oledlg.dll Dependency
Printed From: Codejock Forums
Category: Codejock Products
Forum Name: Skin Framework
Forum Description: Topics Related to Codejock Skin Framework
URL: http://forum.codejock.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=15157
Printed Date: 23 May 2024 at 9:35pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: To Remove oledlg.dll Dependency
Posted By: RudyL
Subject: To Remove oledlg.dll Dependency
Date Posted: 11 September 2009 at 9:01am
|
Hi,
I found that using Skin Framework would make our APP depend on "oledlg.dll". Without "oledlg.dll", our APP cannot be launched on some platforms (like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Preinstallation_Environment - WinPE , Windows Preinstallation Environment). === Product: Xtreme ToolkitPro 11.1.0 (Unicode, static build) Platform: Windows PE 3.0 (32/64-bit) Language: C++ (Visual Studio 2005) === Could you please give us some clues if we can remove this dependency while using Skin Framework? Thanks. Regards, Rudy |
Replies:
Posted By: znakeeye
Date Posted: 14 September 2009 at 3:00am
|
One solution is to simply deploy the dll.
"In windows/system32, these three files should be inserted : MFC42D.DLL, MSVCRTD.DLL, and oledlg.dll. You can find them in the directory where Visual Studio 2005 installed"
http://www.codeguru.com/csharp/.net/net_general/toolsand3rdparty/article.php/c15255__2/ - http://www.codeguru.com/csharp/.net/net_general/toolsand3rdparty/article.php/c15255__2/ ------------- PokerMemento - http://www.pokermemento.com/ |
Posted By: mgampi
Date Posted: 14 September 2009 at 4:03am
Hi; are you shure that the DEBUG versions of MFC42 and MSVCRT should be deployed? ------------- Martin Product: Xtreme Toolkit v 19.0.0, new Projects v 19.1.0 Platform: Windows 10 v 1909 (64bit) Language: VC++ 2017 |
znakeeye wrote:Posted By: ABuenger
Date Posted: 14 September 2009 at 4:37am
|
You should never need to deploy the MFC42, it's already pre-installed on all systems. And of course not the DEBUG version. ------------- Codejock support |
Posted By: RudyL
Date Posted: 14 September 2009 at 9:05am
Thanks for the suggestion. However, we are trying not to include oledlg.dll (in case of any legal issues). Thanks anyway. Regards, Rudy |
Posted By: ABuenger
Date Posted: 16 September 2009 at 10:49am
Get rid of unnecessary includes in StdAfx.h ------------- Codejock support |