Codejock Forums Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Codejock Products > Visual C++ MFC > Controls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - BS_3STATE vs. BS_CHECKBOX in CXTCheckListBox
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

BS_3STATE vs. BS_CHECKBOX in CXTCheckListBox

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Oleg View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 21 May 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11234
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Oleg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: BS_3STATE vs. BS_CHECKBOX in CXTCheckListBox
    Posted: 15 December 2010 at 1:37am
Hi,

Thanks, description fixed.


You can set style to BS_AUTO3STATE  and in CLBN_CHKCHANGE handler change manuall check state to "0" if its "2".
Oleg, Support Team
CODEJOCK SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS
Back to Top
cpede View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 13 August 2004
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 647
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cpede Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 December 2010 at 5:19am
You write the following in the doc for the CXTCheckListBox control:
 
// Remarks:
// Styles to be added or removed can be combined by using the bitwise
// OR (|) operator. It can be one or more of the following:
// * <b>BS_3STATE</b> Same as a check box, exce..............
 
Actually it cannot be one or more, since your code does this check:
 
ASSERT(
  nStyle == 0 ||
  nStyle == BS_CHECKBOX ||
  nStyle == BS_AUTOCHECKBOX ||
  nStyle == BS_AUTO3STATE ||
  nStyle == BS_3STATE);
I wanted to be able programmably to set an item to 3STATE, while the user should only be able to select and deselected items. Can this be done ?
 
-cpede
Product: Xtreme ToolkitPro (22.1.0)
Platform: Windows 10 (x64)
Language: Visual Studio 2017 (C++)
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.