Codejock Forums Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Codejock Products > Visual C++ MFC > Controls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Controls are cumbersome
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Controls are cumbersome

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
znakeeye View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 July 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1672
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote znakeeye Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Controls are cumbersome
    Posted: 17 August 2008 at 2:03pm
Yeah. I spent weeks on my ribbon, and now my competitors will be able to do the same in a couple of minutes. Grrr! :)
Back to Top
ABuenger View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 02 February 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1075
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ABuenger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 August 2008 at 10:11am
Originally posted by znakeeye znakeeye wrote:

Don't waste your time writing wrappers for nothing ;)
 
CString str((LPCTSTR)IDS_STRING);


I think this constructor is pretty ugly. I never understood why there is no CString(UINT nID) constructor. That would even make CString(0) and CString(NULL) ambigoius which I think would be a good thing because both are not valid.

CString::CString(LPCTSTR lpsz)
{
    Init();
    if (lpsz != NULL && HIWORD(lpsz) == NULL)
    {
        UINT nID = LOWORD((DWORD)lpsz);
    }
}


Originally posted by znakeeye znakeeye wrote:

or, my personal favorite:
foo(_S(IDS_STRING)); // Simple code :)


I like that one _T() and _S()

But the primary reason for my post was that the XTP controls are cumbersome. I don't understand why Codejock doesn't get the basics done but instead works on a useless Ribbon designer.

Codejock support
Back to Top
znakeeye View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 July 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1672
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote znakeeye Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 August 2008 at 6:26am
Don't waste your time writing wrappers for nothing ;)
 
CString str((LPCTSTR)IDS_STRING);
 
or, my personal favorite:
inline CString _S(UINT nID)
{
#ifdef _DEBUG
     CString str;
     ASSERT(str.LoadString(nID));
#else
     return CString((LPCTSTR)nID);
#endif
}
 
foo(_S(IDS_STRING)); // Simple code :)
Back to Top
ABuenger View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 02 February 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1075
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ABuenger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 July 2008 at 7:10am
Originally posted by ABuenger ABuenger wrote:


And last but not least could you please a SetWindowText(UINT nID); method which takes a string id?


Wrote a little wrapper:

class CStringResource : public CString
{
public:
   CStringResource(UINT nID)
   {
      VERIFY(LoadString(nID));
   }
};


Codejock support
Back to Top
ABuenger View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: 02 February 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 1075
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ABuenger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 July 2008 at 4:39pm
I've changed some CButton to CXTPButton to get the Office 2007 look, but for each button the theme has be set at runtime, that's horrible. I would expect a CXTPDialog class with a SetTheme() method which then sets the theme of all child controls.

Also there is no CXTPListBox and CXTPComboBox. I would expect all common controls with the different themes.

And last but not least could you please a SetWindowText(UINT nID); method which takes a string id?

Thanks

Codejock support
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.04
Copyright ©2001-2021 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.